JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 27, 2010

A- de 2010

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Jorge Eliecer Ortiz Lozano Vs Registraduria Nacional Del Estado Civil

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Juzgado Segundo Promiscuo Municipal de Natgaima, Tolima, el cual considera que la entidad demandada es de orden nacional y por lo tanto remitió el expediente al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Ibagué, el cual no avocó el conocimiento de la acción atendiendo a las directrices expuestas en el auto 124 de 2009.

La Sala encuentra que la entidad accionada es de orden nacional por lo tanto es competente el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial para dar tramite a la decisión de primera instancia y proferir una decisión de fondo.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. DEJAR SIN EFECTOS el auto proferido por el Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Ibagué, Sala Civil Familia, de fecha 30 de abril de 2010.
  2. Segundo. REMITIR el expediente al Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Ibagué, Sala Civil Familia para que de forma inmediata, tramite la primera instancia y profiera decisión de fondo respecto del amparo solicitado, conforme a las previsiones del artículo 86 de la Constitución Política y del Decreto 2591 de 1991
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría General, COMUNICAR al Juzgado
  4. Segundo. Promiscuo Municipal de Natagaima, Tolima, la decisión adoptada en esta providencia.
  5. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.